Mercury Levels in Great Lakes Fish Is on the Rise

fish

The amount of mercury found in fish tissues has dropped steadily over decades since the 1970s. That corresponded with the reduction of pollution coming from Midwestern smokestacks as regulations tightened, pollution prevention technology improved, and coal-fired factories and power plants went offline.

But over the last several years, that started changing. Scientists are finding mercury levels rising in large Great Lakes fish such as walleye and lake trout. Curiously, it’s occurring with fish in some locations but not others. Researchers are still trying to figure out why. The mercury levels are not surpassing U.S. Environmental Protection Agency thresholds. But researchers want to determine if what they are seeing is a temporary trend or a trajectory that’s only going to worsen. Mercury is a heavy, silvery metal, unusual in that it’s liquid at room temperature. It’s naturally occurring, but is rare to find uncombined with other elements. It is toxic to humans and animals — and unlike many other toxins, mercury remains in the environment for very long periods of time, moving up the food chain and compounding inside animals that ingest it. The EPA has found that mercury in water has the potential to cause kidney damage from short-term exposures at levels above the maximum contaminant level of just 0.002 parts per million. Mercury can inhibit brain development in fetuses and children, and harm immune systems and adult heart function.

Many types of mercury in the environment tend to pass through fish when ingested. But a type known as methylmercury tends to be absorbed into fish tissues. As small fish eat contaminated insects, and medium-sized fish eat the smaller fish, and large game fish eat the medium fish, those mercury concentrations get magnified exponentially, a process known as bioaccumulation.

Although reasons for the gradual but steady increase in mercury in Great Lakes fish are unclear, the leading theory ties the increase to gradually warming water temperatures. Also climate change has resulted in a lot of flooding which causes re-suspension of sediments. What was buried can become exposed, increasing the availability of mercury in lake water. Invasive species such as the zebra and quagga mussel population which change the diet of lake fish are also suspected as a cause of rising mercury levels.

The need for continued close monitoring of mercury levels in the lakes is critical, and this comes at a bad time in light of  President Trump’s 2017 budget proposal that calls for elimination of virtually all Great Lakes restoration funds.

Excerpted from USA Today.

Pure Water Gazette Fair Use Statement

missedtheboat (1)

Their species is now extinct because they foolishly forgot to subscribe to the Pure Water Occasional. The email Occasional keeps you up to date on the intriguing world of water, including upcoming deluges, sea partings,  and other big water events. After many years, it is still free for the asking.  Subscribe at the top right of this page.

US Dams: Are They Safe?


Posted March 13th, 2017

Are US Dams Safe?

Dam disasters have been rare but spectacular.

The recent scare at the Oroville Dam in California has brought dam safety to public attention. The following is adapted from a piece by Jeremy P. Jacobs.

southforkdam

The catastrophic failure of the South Fork Dam in 1889 killed more than 2,200 people in Johnstown, Pennsylvania.

There have been many U.S. dam failures. And some have been catastrophic.

In May 1889, the 72-foot-tall South Fork Dam on western Pennsylvania’s man-made Lake Conemaugh gave way, unleashing a 40-foot wall of water that hit the city of Johnstown, nearly 9 miles away. More than 2,200 people were killed–that’s 1 out of every 5 Johnstown residents.

And in California, the St. Francis Dam was considered an engineering feat in Los Angeles County until it failed in 1928, killing as many as 400 people.

The Baldwin Hills Dam, also in Los Angeles, gave way, killing five in 1963. In 1976, the Bureau of Reclamation’s Teton Dam in eastern Idaho collapsed, killing 11 and causing more than $1 billion in property damage.

The most recent dam failure to cause a fatality occurred in 2006, when the earthen Ka Loko Dam in Kauai, Hawaii, breached, killing seven people.

Some experts caution against making too much of the number of fatalities linked to dam failures.

Martin McCann of Stanford University’s National Performance of Dams Program said that since the 1850s, dams have killed probably a little more than 4,000 people — a large number, but one that pales in comparison to auto accidents, for example.

“If your argument were to be based on body counts, crocodiles and deer running on highways might beat out dams,” McCann said.

He noted that dam inspections and state and federal authorities have improved, especially since the 1970s when fatalities from dam failures peaked at more than 450 in the decade.

“It’s not black and white. Do we have a lot of dams that pose a risk to the public? Yeah, we do,” he said. “Are they all in terrible shape? Not even close.”

Reference source:  E & E News.

Water News


Posted March 13th, 2017

Current Water News

by Hardly Waite

Water Litigation

In the ongoing state vs. state water wars being waged in the courts, Georgia won a major decision hardly4over Florida and Texas won over New Mexico. Both cases involve the right to water in rivers that pass through both states.

In a more complex litigation about water, the Trump administration (as did also the Obama administration) is asking a federal court to dismiss a lawsuit by New Mexico and the Navajo Nation over a 2015 mine-waste spill caused by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at the abandoned Gold King Mine in Colorado.  There are 1.2 billion in claims, and the government is denying responsibility because the agency was simply aiding in cleanup caused by operators of the mine. Republicans earlier slammed the Obama administration for taking the same stance as the current administration.

The 2015 spill was caused by an EPA contractor who, working with federal and state employees, miscalculated the pressure of wastewater at the abandoned mine. About 3 million gallons of toxic sludge spilled out, turning the Animas River orange for days, along with downstream rivers that run through New Mexico and the Navajo Nation’s reservation.

New Mexico has also sued Colorado in the Supreme Court over its alleged responsibility for the spill. The high court is considering whether to hear that case.

Other Water News

New York city’s need for water infrastructure upgrade is expected to cost $80 billion over the next 20 years.

Oklahoma is considering joining the practice of several other states of storing water underground by using “leaky ponds” to recharge aquifers. Rather than allow surplus water to leave the state as runoff to rivers or to be stored in lakes subject to loss by evaporation, water is redirected to aquifers to be pumped to the surface in times of need.

Good News for Lake Mead, and Consequently Las Vegas: Federal forecasters now expect the Lake Mead reservoir to avoid its first federal shortage declaration next year, thanks to the boost it should get from what could wind up as the wettest winter on the river’s basin in 20 years. Storms in Utah, Colorado and Wyoming over the past month have added more than 3 million acre-feet to the water supply forecast for the Colorado. That’s a 10-year supply for Nevada, which gets 300,000 acre-feet from the river each year.

There is a rather extensive research project going on at the University of Michigan that is designed to find the most effective ways to convert urine into fertilizer that can be used to help plants grow. Urine is rich is nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium. The current phase of the project features uses of a special toilet that harvests fertilizer ingredients from human urine.

Although reservoirs are seldom thought of as part of the water infrastructure that needs maintenance, water managers are catching on that many of the nation’s reservoirs are operating at a fraction of their original capacity because they are filling with silt, sand and gravel. Evidence is growing that cleaning the debris out of our reservoirs to restore their holding capacity makes more sense than searching for new sources of water by building dams and drilling more wells.

 

Gazette’s Famous Water Picture Series: The Lake Berryessa Glory Hole

gloryhole3lakeberryessa

Lake Berryessa Glory Hole

Lake Berryessa is the largest lake in Napa County, California. The reservoir in the Vaca Mountains is formed by the Monticello Dam, which provides water and hydroelectricity to the North Bay region of the San Francisco Bay Area.

What you see in the picture is the dam’s spillway, which because of California’s drought had not overflowed for a long, long time. After a drought-ridden 10-year period, in February of 2017 water finally spilled into Lake Berryessa’s Glory Hole, bringing an end to the longest gap between spills in the lake’s history.

The Glory Hole is near the dam on the southeast side of the reservoir. It is an open bell-mouth spillway, 72 feet in diameter. The pipe has a straight drop of 200 feet,  and the diameter shrinks down to about 28 feet. The spillway has a maximum capacity of 48,000 cfs (cubic feet per second).  One cubic foot per second is about 450 gallons per minute, so the Glory Hole’s capacity to drain the lake is about 21 million gpm.  The spillway operates when there is excess water in the reservoir. In 2017 after heavy rains it started flowing, for the first time since 2006.

In 1997 a woman was killed after being pulled inside the spillway.

gloryhole2

The Glory Hole when it isn’t overflowing

History of UV Water Treatment


Posted March 11th, 2017

History of Ultraviolet Water Treatment

uv-wavelength-700x407

Although UV has other applications in water treatment, such as chloramine reduction, by far the most common use is for germicidal disinfection. As the picture illustrates, the standard UV dosage for germicidal treatment is 254 nanometers.

Although it’s taken a long time for the technology to become widely adopted, UV has been around for a long time. In 1877, the germicidal properties of sunlight were discovered and it was only a matter of time before people tried to apply this knowledge for practical use. In 1903, Niels Fensen received a Nobel Prize for his use of ultraviolet light to combat tuberculosis, and in 1910, the first drinking water disinfection system opened in Marseilles, France.

From that time, the technology changed very little until the 1930s, when the first tubular lamps were developed. The tubular lamp allowed for easier applications and different configurations for use. In the 1950s, the first truly significant research into UV disinfection began. By the 1960s, UV disinfection was becoming more widely used in commercial applications and was creeping into the residential market.

Today, ultraviolet disinfection is widely accepted as an effective treatment for the removal of microbiological contaminants from water. Although it was initially viewed as a treatment for un-chlorinated well water, the use of UV for city water residential applications is increasing rapidly. As the infrastructure that cities use to deliver water to customers deteriorates, point-of-entry UV is expected to become a standard feature in homes.

Even highly chlorine-resistant microbes such as Giardia and Cryptosporidium can be effectively eliminated from water with UV. UV systems are becoming an increasingly popular alternative to chemical treatment for many applications.

Reference: Viqua.

See also,  The Basics of UV Water Treatment.”

Compact Whole House Cartridge-Style Filter Installation

compactwhinstallation475

Compact Whole House Filters Installed in Series.  Water passes through the sediment filter and then through the carbon block filter.

An extremely versatile product,  Pure Water Products’ Compact Whole House Filters can be installed in series, as shown above, or in parallel, as shown in the picture below.

wholehousesplitcropped1[1]

Parallel Installation gives double the flow rate potential. Two cartridges capable of handling 7 gallons-per-minute each become a 14 gallon-per-minute filter when the water line is split so that each filter handles half the flow.

druliainstallation

Installation with sediment prefilter (right), split to two carbon filters, then coming together to feed water softener (left).  (Click picture to enlarge.)

As the pictures show, even our multi-filter systems are sold for mounting on single brackets. This is a great advantage for the installer. The flow can be directed either right to left or left to right, the bracket can be pointed up or down, and multiple units can even be installed in separate locations, when space is tight. The filters can also be installed either in series (first picture) or in parallel (second picture).

The “20 inch Big Blue” housing accepts 4.5″ X 20″ cartridges, a standard size, so many filtration options are available.  The housing works with radial flow cartridges, where water flows from the outside of the cartridge to the center (carbon block and sediment filters) or axial flow cartridges, where water flows the full length of the cartridge from bottom to top (“media” cartridges with granular carbon, iron removal media, KDF, softening resin, pH amenders, etc.).

compactwh4

The Pure Water Products Compact Whole House Filter comes with housing, one filter cartridge, mounting bracket with screws, and a filter wrench for cartridge replacement.

Typical applications of this filter are for whole house city water treatment of sediment, chlorine, chloramines, taste/odor, and extraneous chemicals, or well water treatment of sediment, low pH, iron, manganese, odors, and scaling.

Compact units are easy to install, needing no drain or electrical connection, inexpensive, and versatile. The standard pipe size is 1″, but they are available also in 3/4″ and 1.5″ sizes.

Cartridges that will fit our Compact Whole House systems.

Compact Whole House Filters

 

Backwashing Filters with 4″ Top Holes

2850filter

Fleck 2815 Filter, 21″ X 62″.  Will support a service flow of up to 50 gallons per minute.

Most residential backwashing filters have 2.5″ threaded top holes in the mineral tank. Conventional “small” filter valves like the Fleck 5600, Fleck 2510, and Fleck 5810 screw into 2.5″ top holes.  These control valves can be used on tanks up to 13″ in diameter.  Beginning with 14″ tanks, most have 4″ top holes and require the use of larger filter valves, like the Fleck 2750, 2815, or 3150. (Note: Fleck 2815 was formerly 2850. Fleck 2850 is no longer available.) Tanks with 4″ holes are available up to 24″ X 72″ in size. (The next larger size of tanks have a 6″ flange connection on top rather than a threaded hole.)

For want of better name, we call the filters made with the second size top hole 4″ filters. The filter above is from this group.

In general terms, filters of this size are for use in situations needing flow rates above 10 gallons per minute. Here is a chart that gives some typical uses with maximum effective service flow rates, in gallons per minute (GPM).

Tank Size in Inches

(Media Load with Most Media, in cubic feet)

Carbon Filter removing chlorine from city water

Katalox Light Filter removing iron from well water

Zeolite (Turbidex) filter removing sediment from well water.

14 X 65 (3.5)  10  11  21
16 X 65 (4)  14  14  25
18 X 65 (5)  18  18  28
21 X 62 (7)  24  24  32
24 X 72 (10)  30  32  62
30 X 72 (15)  50  49  73
36 X 72 (20)  70  70  125

Be aware that there can be great discrepancies among media when it comes to service flow rates and backwash requirements.  For example, Turbidex will support a much higher service flow rate than Filter Ag.

Big Filter Prices

Prices of filters given below include control valve (mechanical timer), Structural Mineral Tank, Drain Line Flow Control, Riser with upper and lower baskets, media funnel, and gravel underbed. We pay shipping to lower-48 addresses. Usual lead time is about 4 days. These filters all have the standard electro-mechanical timer. Electronic SXT andNXT2 controls are available on some models at a slightly higher price.  Please inquire.  Important note: pricing on these units is now all “call to order.” We now also have Nelsen C-Series filters in most of the same sizes. Call for pricing and availability.

Tank Size in Inches

(Media Load with Most Media, in cubic feet)

Fleck 2750, 1″ Control.  Currently unavailable.

Part Number

Fleck 2815, 1.5″ Control

Part Number

Fleck 3150, 2.0″ Control

Part Number

14 X 65 (3.5) BW102 BW281
16 X 65 (4) BW105 BW282
18 X 65 (5) BW103 BW283
21 X 62 (7) BW104 BW284
24 X 72 (10) BW285 BW290
30 X 72 (15) BW291  (6″ Flange)
36 X 72 (20) BW292  (6″ Flange)

Prices above are for the filter only. Gravel underbed is included, but not filter media.

Filters may be ordered with or without media. If media is purchased with the filter, the filter will be set up to match the media. If no media is ordered, tell us your intended use for the filter and we will equip the filter with an appropriate flow control device. There is no pre-shipment setup of control valves with the these filters, but we can suggest and help with setup after the purchase.

Filter Media, Prices can be found on our main website, here.

Media available for these filters:

Granular Filter Carbon, for Chlorine, Chloramine, Chemicals, Taste & Odor, Color

Standard Bitumious

Coconut Shell

Centaur Catalytic

Aquasorb (Jacobi) Coconut Shell Catalytic:

Colorsorb Lignite

Iron, Manganese, and Hydrogen Sulfide

Birm

Katalox Light

Filox

Sediment and Precipitated Iron:

Filter Ag

Zeolite (Turbidex)

Multi-Media (garnet, sand, anthracite)

fleck2850with2510

For size comparison, a 21″ X 62″ filter (10 cubic feet of media) beside a 10″ X 54″ filter (1.5 cubic feet of media).

These filters can be ordered by calling 888 382 3814.

Turning Water Into Electricity

Pure Water Gazette’s Famous Water Picture Series

Jablanicalake

Jalanica Lake, 2017

A large artificial lake in the Balkan state of Bosnia and Herzegovina, called Jalanica Lake, totally vanished this month and with it an estimated 2 million fish.

Water levels in the lake are usually regulated to keep enough water to generate hydroelectricity and to avoid floods in the city of Mostar, which lies downstream. So it came as a surprise to local people to see the lake completely drained and with it all its life gone.

Normally, the lake is 30 kilometres long, around a kilometre wide with a depth of about 70 metres. Water levels had dramatically dropped twice before, during droughts in 2005 and 2012, but never by this much.

The discharge was carried out largely last month by power firm Elektroprivreda BiH, which says it was needed to maintain electricity production during a dry and especially cold period when energy demand was above average.

Scientist agree that the ecosystem has been completely degraded. However, Elektroprivreda BiH said in a press release that the discharge didn’t cause an ecological disaster, and added that water is already returning, as it did in 2012, when low levels also didn’t hurt fish stocks.

Reference: New Scientist.

Pure Water Gazette Fair Use Statement

How Lead Got Into Flint’s Water

The following is excerpted from an excellent article by Michael Torrice  in Chemical & Engineering News. It gives a concise and clear explanation of the procedures that city water departments use to keep contaminants like lead, copper, and iron in the pipes and not in the water, and it shows how fragile this system is and what happens when, through ignorance, greed, or lack of concern, water officials fail to follow the rules.–Hardly Waite.

flintwatertower

Lead contamination is the most troubling in a series of water problems that have plagued Flint since the summer of 2014. All of them were caused by corrosion in the lead and iron pipes that distribute water to city residents. When the city began using the Flint River as its water source in April 2014, it didn’t adequately control the water’s ability to corrode those pipes. This led to high lead levels, rust-colored tap water, and possibly the growth of pathogenic microbes.

The pipes in Flint’s old distribution system had seen the same water for decades. Switching water supplies in 2014 changed the chemistry of the water flowing through those pipes. When a switch like this happens, the water system is going to move toward a new equilibrium, says Daniel Giammar, an environmental engineer at Washington University in St. Louis. “It could be catastrophic as it was in Flint, or it could be a small change.”

Before 2014, Flint was getting its water from the Detroit Water & Sewerage Department, which would draw water from Lake Huron and then treat it before sending it to Flint. Looking to lower the city’s water costs, Flint officials decided in 2013 to instead take water from the Karegnondi Water Authority, which was building its own pipeline from the lake. As an interim solution, while waiting for the new pipeline to be finished, Flint began taking water from the Flint River and treating it at the city’s own plant.

flintwater

Problems with the city’s tap water started the summer after the switch. First, residents noticed foul-tasting, reddish water coming out of their taps. In August and September, the city issued alerts about Escherichia coli contamination and told people to boil the water before using it. A General Motors plant stopped using the water in October because it was corroding steel parts. In December, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality notified Flint that its water was in violation of national drinking water standards because it contained high levels of trihalomethanes, toxic by-products of chlorine disinfection.

Then, in early 2015, reports of high lead levels started making news. In January, it was Flint’s University of Michigan campus; in February, it was a private home.

By early September 2015, a Virginia Tech team had sampled water from 252 homes and reported on their website, flintwaterstudy.org, that the city’s 90th percentile lead level was 25 ppb. EPA’s action limit is based on a 90th percentile calculation, meaning that if 10% of homes exceed the agency’s 15-ppb threshold, then action is required.

That same month a team led by Mona Hanna-Attisha, a pediatrician at Hurley Children’s Hospital, in Flint, released data showing that the number of Flint children with elevated levels of lead in their blood had increased since the water change.  In areas with the highest lead concentrations in the water, about 10% of the children had elevated blood levels of the element. Lead is neurotoxic and can disrupt children’s development, leading to behavioral problems and decreased intelligence.

With evidence of lead contamination mounting, Flint switched back to the Detroit water in October.

Why did the switch to Flint’s river water cause this catastrophe?

To understand the problem, consider that as water travels through the miles of pipes in a city’s distribution system, molecules in the water react with the pipes themselves. “The distribution system acts like a geochemical reactor,” says Haizhou Liu, an environmental engineer at the University of California, Riverside. “There are miles and miles of pipes—some iron, copper, and lead—that get corroded.” This corrosion occurs when oxidants, such as dissolved oxygen or chlorine disinfectant, react with elemental iron, lead, or copper in the pipes.

Cities no longer install lead pipes. But older cities such as Flint still rely on them, usually as service lines that connect water mains in the street to a home’s water meter. A 1990 report from the American Water Works Association estimates there are millions of lead service lines in the U.S. To limit how much lead leaches into the water from these pipes and some homes’ plumbing, EPA’s Lead & Copper Rule requires water utilities serving more than 50,000 people to establish a plan to monitor and control corrosion.

The Passivation Layer: As Important  as the Pipe Itself

As part of these plans, utilities treat their water to maintain a mineral crust on the inside surfaces of their pipes. This so-called passivation layer protects the pipes’ metal from oxidants in the water. The coatings consist, in part, of insoluble oxidized metal compounds produced as the pipe slowly corrodes.

If the water’s chemistry isn’t optimized, then the passivation layer may start to dissolve, or mineral particles may begin to flake off of the pipe’s crust. This exposes bare metal, allowing the iron, lead, or copper to oxidize and leach into the water.

In Flint, the water chemistry was not optimized to control corrosion.

Phosphate

Most important, the treated Flint River water lacked one chemical that the treated Detroit water had: phosphate.  Cities such as Detroit add orthophosphate to their water as part of their corrosion control plans because the compound encourages the formation of lead phosphates, which are largely insoluble and can add to the pipes’ passivation layer.

The entire Flint water crisis could have been avoided, experts believe, if the city had just added orthophosphate. In experiments using the city’s water, simply adding a phosphate corrosion inhibitor sharply reduced the amount of lead leached from pipes.

Still, orthophosphate isn’t the only corrosion solution. Some water utilities treat water so it has a high pH and high alkalinity.  Such conditions decrease the solubility of lead carbonates, which also contribute to the pipe’s protective mineral layer.

pH

The treated Flint River water had a relatively low pH that decreased over time. According to monthly operating reports from the Flint treatment plant, the city’s water had a pH of about 8 in December 2014, but then it slowly dropped to 7.3 by August 2015. Environmental engineers say that if water pH drifts too low in the absence of orthophosphate, the water can start to leach high levels of lead from pipes.

The pH drop over time seems to indicate that plant operators in Flint didn’t even have a target pH as part of a corrosion plan. Water utilities usually find a pH that’s optimal for preventing corrosion in their system. For example, in Boston, another city with old lead pipes, average water pH held steady around 9.6 in 2015.

Chloride

Another chemical factor that contributed to the treated river water’s corrosiveness was its chloride concentration. The treated Detroit water’s average chloride level was 11.4 parts per million in 2014. The treated Flint water had 85-ppm chloride in August 2015.  The plant may have contributed to these high levels when it tried to address high levels of toxic trihalomethanes.

Treatment for THMs

Disinfection by-products such as trihalomethanes can form through reactions between organic matter in water and chlorine disinfectant added at treatment plants. The Flint plant had increased the amount of chlorine it used in the summer of 2014 to combat the E. coli contamination problem. To reduce levels of trihalomethanes that formed, the plant removed organic matter from the water by adding ferric chloride, which coagulates organic matter, making it easier to filter out. Even though the treatment took care of the trihalomethanes problem, it increased the water’s chloride levels.

Environmental engineers worry about high chloride levels because studies have shown that lead corrosion is more likely when the ratio of chloride to sulfate concentrations is greater than 0.58. Researchers at Virginia Tech calculated the ratio for treated Detroit water as 0.45 and for treated Flint River water as 1.6.

Iron Pipes and Lead Pipes

Corrosion of lead pipes caused Flint’s most serious water issue, but corrosion of the city’s iron pipes also created problems. The chemistry that controls iron pipe corrosion is a little more complicated than the chemistry surrounding lead pipe corrosion, but some of the same factors play a role.

ironcorrosion

Iron Corrosion in Flint Pipes

Problems with Flint’s iron pipes started early: The rust color and bad taste of the water coming out of residents’ taps in the summer of 2014 was a sign that the passivation layer on iron pipes was dissolving into the water.

But the issue that worries environmental engineers most about iron corrosion is that it could encourage the growth of pathogens in the distribution system. As the mineral layer in iron pipes falls off, it exposes bare iron that can reduce free chlorine added to the water as a pathogen-killing disinfectant. Some homes had no detectable chlorine levels when monitored.

Decreased Usage

Another issue could have worsened both the corrosion and disinfection problems. Much of the distribution system was built when the city’s population was about 200,000 and Flint was a major manufacturing center. But the city now has less than half the population, and much of the industry, which used a lot of Flint’s water, has left town. As a result, water usage has dropped significantly, while the system’s capacity has remained the same.

This means that water sits in the distribution system for long periods.  In some places, the water sits in pipes for more than six days before use, providing more time for reactions that corrode pipes and break down chlorine.

Now that Flint has switched back to the Detroit water, environmental engineers believe that it may take months to a year for pipes to regain their passivation layers, for corrosion to slow to normal levels, and for lead concentrations to drop back into an acceptable range. The lesson, according to one authority, is that “when we collect data, we need to use those data. Utility officials had all the data they needed about pH, alkalinity, and chloride levels to determine that the water was corrosive. They just failed to act on that information.  She points out that the water utility officials were already collecting all the data they needed—pH, alkalinity, chloride levels—to determine if the water was too corrosive. The lesson is that there is an undeniable connection between water chemistry and infrastructure.

Reference: How Lead Ended Up in Flint’s Tap Water, by Michael Torrice.

Pure Water Gazette Fair Use Statement

The Issues with “Softened Water”

singbetter0309

 You’ll sing better with softened water (once you realize that the slimy feeling  is really good for you)

As pure water falls to earth, it picks up contaminants, absorbing gases like carbon dioxide and dissolving metals and minerals it comes in contact with. Rain water is naturally “soft,” low in Total Dissolved Solids (TDS),  but it is “aggressive,” looking for minerals to dissolve. As it picks up minerals like calcium and magnesium, it become “hard.”

Even small amounts of hardness minerals, calcium and magnesium,  cause the water to exhibit typical hard-water characteristics. The higher the hardness level, the more evident the problems will be. Residential and commercial water users typically identify two significant problems when dealing with hard water:

Scale: Hardness scale causes water heaters to waste energy and eventually fail,  and unattractive mineral deposits accumulate on fixtures. Faucets and appliances fail. Metal pipes pick up interior scale deposits and inhibit the free flow of water.

Soap interactions: Laundering results aren’t satisfactory; dishes, glasses and silverware are not clean enough and larger amounts of cleaning materials are required.

Water Softeners

For over a century, salt-based ion exchange softening has been the gold standard in addressing these issues. Water softener technology is relatively easy to install in homes and businesses and relatively cost-efficient to own and operate. Salt-based softeners are now very user friendly, with such efficiency enhancements as metered vs. timer controls, twin-tank systems, improved resins, and upflow regeneration. Advances in technology save water and salt. Even with these technological improvements, however, many people can’t or won’t use a salt-based system and actively seek alternatives. While many alternatives exist in the marketplace today, it is important to understand that ion exchange softeners alone deal with the soap issue and that most alternatives address only the problem of scale formation.

Probably the three most common objections to softened water are that it might be corrosive, that it is not healthful to drink, and that it leaves a slimy feel on the skin.

Corrosion in the form of damaged hot water heaters or heater anodes does not occur because water has been softened, but it is true that it can occur in spite of softening if pH is outside the acceptable range (7.0 to 8.5), if TDS exceeds 500, or if the softener itself is not rinsing itself thoroughly during regeneration. Water actually retains its alkaline nature after softening and softened water is usually only slightly higher in total dissolved solids than the pre-treated water, since softening normally gives back more or less what it takes out in terms of TDS. For the calcium and magnesium it removes, it exchanges a nearly equal amount of sodium.

As for the healthfulness of softened water, Greg Reyneke writes:

Softened water does not contain sodium chloride or potassium chloride salt. During the ion exchange process, sodium or potassium ions are added to water in direct proportion to the amount of other ions being removed from the raw water. The result of this sodium addition is the formation of sodium carbonate and bicarbonate compounds in the water, which do indeed contribute to taste. At hardness levels < 15 gpg (grains per gallon), many people describe the additional sodium as making the water taste sweet or well-rounded. At higher hardness levels, some drinkers begin to identify an alkaline or soda flavor in the water. If the water from a softener tastes salty, this is not normal, and [you] shouldn’t drink it.

Hypertensive persons, or those on sodium-restricted diets, are concerned about the total amount of sodium that they consume in a day. The process of softening water generally adds 1.86 mg/L for every grain of hardness removed, so when you soften 15-gpg water, you’re adding almost 28 mg/L of sodium to whatever is already naturally there. To put that into perspective, one teaspoon of salt contains approximately 2,000 mg of sodium and cow’s milk contains approximately 125 mg of sodium per cup. . . .

While there are many arguments for and against consuming the inorganic minerals found in hard water, my personal decision is simple: since the inorganic minerals in water are so difficult for the human body to assimilate compared to the abundant and easily assimilated organic mineral compounds found in common fruits and vegetables, I choose to derive nutrition from food and hydration from water, while making sure that the water I drink is as pure as possible.

We can add that if the salt content of water is objectionable, addition of an undercounter reverse osmosis unit will remove the sodium and leave only pure, excellent tasting water. There are now even post filters for reverse osmosis units that add a small amount of mineral hardness back into the treated water to polish the taste and satisfy those who object to drinking low-mineral water.

Squeaky Clean Is Really More Like Squeaky Dirty

The slimy feel that people often complain of in regard to softened water is harder to pin down. This is also experienced as the feeling that soap won’t wash off of the skin. According to Reyneke, the feel of any water on the skin is affected mainly by pH. Water low in pH feels rough and water with higher pH feels smooth or slick. This is true even if soap isn’t used.

In hard water, soap loses its ability to clean and forms into a sticky, waxy precipitate called soap scum or soap curd. This scum clings to skin and hair, producing the “squeaky clean” feel that we are accustomed to with hard water. “The problem is,” according to Reyneke, “that squeaky clean, is really more like squeaky dirty, since soap precipitate and soil deposits are left behind on the skin.”

So, you can just tell yourself that the slick feel and the illusion that soap won’t wash off are really advantageous, or you can try some tricks that might make the softened water more to your liking. Reyneke suggests switching to a potassium-base soap or changing the regenerant of the softener from sodium to potassium. Note also that various soaps have different pH levels, so it may be your soap raising the pH so much that the water feels slick. You may be blaming your softener for something that’s actually your fault for using the wrong soap.

Or, you certainly might consider that being “squeaky dirty” isn’t really a disadvantage. There are those who believe that most of us bathe too much anyway and that it isn’t healthful to wash away the natural oils from our skin. From this point of view, a little hardness in the water might keep us from scrubbing away the natural skin oils that form a natural protection from  the sun.

Reference: Grey Reyneke, “Hard to Lather, Easy to Fix” from Water Treatment and Purification magazine.