The system that moves water around the Earth is off balance for the first time in human history

By Laura Paddison, CNNWed October 16, 2024

Humanity has thrown the global water cycle off balance “for the first time in human history,” fueling a growing water disaster that will wreak havoc on economies, food production and lives, according to a landmark new report.

Decades of destructive land use and water mismanagement have collided with the human-caused climate crisis to put “unprecedented stress” on the global water cycle, said the report published Wednesday by the Global Commission on the Economics of Water, a group of international leaders and experts.

The water cycle refers to the complex system by which water moves around the Earth. Water evaporates from the ground — including from lakes, rivers and plants — and rises into the atmosphere, forming large rivers of water vapor able to travel long distances, before cooling, condensing and eventually falling back to the ground as rain or snow.

Disruptions to the water cycle are already causing suffering. Nearly 3 billion people face water scarcity. Crops are shriveling and cities are sinking as the groundwater beneath them dries out.

The consequences will be even more catastrophic without urgent action. The water crisis threatens more than 50% of global food production and risks shaving an average of 8% off countries’ GDPs by 2050, with much higher losses of up to 15% projected in low-income countries, the report found.

“For the first time in human history, we are pushing the global water cycle out of balance,” said Johan Rockström, co-chair of the Global Commission on the Economics of Water and a report author. “Precipitation, the source of all freshwater, can no longer be relied upon.”

The report differentiates between “blue water,” the liquid water in lakes, rivers and aquifers, and “green water,” the moisture stored in soils and plants.

While the supply of green water has long been overlooked, it is just as important to the water cycle, the report says, as it returns to the atmosphere when plants release water vapor, generating about half of all rainfall over land.

Disruptions to the water cycle are “deeply intertwined” with climate change, the report found.

A stable supply of green water is vital for supporting vegetation that can store planet-heating carbon. But the damage humans inflict, including destroying wetlands and tearing down forests, is depleting these carbon sinks and accelerating global warming. In turn, climate change-fueled heat is drying out landscapes, reducing moisture and increasing fire risk.

The crisis is made more urgent by the huge need for water. The report calculates that, on average, people need a minimum of about 4,000 liters (just over 1,000 gallons) a day to lead a “dignified life,” far above the 50 to 100 liters the United Nations says is needed for basic needs, and more than most regions will be able to provide from local sources.

Richard Allan, a climate science professor at Reading University, England, said the report “paints a grim picture of human-caused disruption to the global water cycle, the most precious natural resource that ultimately sustains our livelihoods.”

Human activities “are altering the fabric of our land and the air above which is warming the climate, intensifying both wet and dry extremes, and sending wind and rainfall patterns out of kilter,” added Allan, who was not involved in the report.

The crisis can only be addressed through better management of natural resources and massive cuts in planet-heating pollution, he told CNN.

The report’s authors say world governments must recognize the water cycle as a “common good” and address it collectively. Countries are dependent on each other, not only through lakes and rivers that span borders, but also because of water in the atmosphere, which can travel huge distances — meaning decisions made in one country can disrupt rainfall in another.

The report calls for a “fundamental regearing of where water sits in economies,” including better pricing to discourage wastefulness and the tendency to plant water-thirsty crops and facilities, such as data centers, in water-stressed regions.

“The global water crisis is a tragedy but is also an opportunity to transform the economics of water,” said Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, director general of the World Trade Organization and a co-chair of the commission that published the report. Valuing water properly is essential, she added, “so as to recognize its scarcity and the many benefits it delivers.”

Source: CNN 

Pure Water Gazette Fair Use Statement

Home Treatment Strategies for PFAS

While a small amount of PFAS may enter the body through the skin during showering, dermal uptake from contact with water of little significance as compared with ingestion of PEAS-contaminated water or contamination from food packaging.  Therefore, the practical strategy for home treatment is to eliminate PFAS from drinking water and not worry a lot about water for bathing or other household uses.

For drinking water, reverse osmosis is a sure thing. It removes PFAS handily.  A good carbon drinking water filter is also a reliable PFAS reducer.  High quality carbon block cartridges have an impressive range for PFAS.  Our standard double undersink filter with MatriKX PB1 and CTO+ cartridges is rated for over 6000 gallons of PFAS removal between cartridge changes. That’s a lot of drinking water. The usual “change once a year” recommendation applies.

For point of entry (whole house) treatment, if you want high PFAS reduction you’ll need to reduce your service flow rate and change cartridges often. A single MatriKX CTO+ in whole house 4.5″ X 20″ size has a 21,000 gallon PFAS reduction capacity at 3 gallons per minute. Two of these installed in parallel would give a 42,000 gallons capacity at a service flow of six gallons per minute.

PFAS can also be effectively treated with ion exchange. This strategy is often used by municipal water suppliers, but is not currently as practical or as affordable for home use as carbon filtration and reverse osmosis.

The health benefits of fluoridated drinking water may be waning as Americans increasingly turn to using toothpastes and mouthwashes that already contain fluoride, a new review suggests.

The research, published this month in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, came to that conclusion after analyzing more than 157 studies that compared tooth decay in kids living in communities that added fluoride to their water supply with communities that didn’t.

Exactly what did the scientists discover?

The studies of more than 5,700 children conducted before fluoride-fortified toothpaste became widely available in the mid-1970s found that adding fluoride to water systems reduced the number of decayed teeth by an average of 2.1 teeth per child.

However, studies conducted after 1975, including nearly 3,000 children in Britain and Australia, estimated the benefit was lower, at 0.24 fewer decayed baby teeth per child, just one-quarter of one tooth.

Despite that finding, the researchers stressed municipalities shouldn’t interpret the results as a reason to stop adding the cavity-fighting mineral to their water systems.

“When interpreting the evidence, it is important to think about the wider context and how society and health have changed over time,” study co-author Anne-Marie Glenny, a professor of health sciences research at the University of Manchester in England, said in a journal news release. “Most of the studies on water fluoridation are over 50 years old, before the availability of fluoride toothpaste. Contemporary studies give us a more relevant picture of what the benefits are now.”

Still, hundreds of U.S. communities are now opting out of water fluoridation, NBC News reported, as groups opposed to fluoride in drinking water raise concerns that it may affect children’s IQ levels.

Just last month, a California federal ruled that even though he couldn’t conclude with certainty that fluoridated water was a danger to public health, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency should strengthen water fluoridation regulations.

About 75% of the U.S. population has tap water with added fluoride at the recommended levels, NBC News reported.

Major public health groups, including the American Dental Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, all maintain their support of fluoridated water.

However, some recent research has hinted that water fluoridation may pose health harms. A study published in May found that women who had higher levels of fluoride during pregnancy said their kids were more likely to have temper tantrums, complain of vague headaches and stomachaches and show other neurobehavioral symptoms by age 3.

Review co-author Janet Clarkson, a professor of clinical effectiveness at the University of Dundee in Scotland, said the new research may serve to “open up a dialogue” to further understand the impact of public water fluoridation.

While water fluoridation helps fight cavities, it doesn’t eliminate the harms of high sugar consumption or poor oral health behaviors, Clark noted in a journal news release.

“It is likely that any oral health preventive program needs to take a multifaceted, multiagency approach,” she added.

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more on fluoridated drinking water.

Source: HealthDay News.

Pure Water Gazette Fair Use Statement

Water News for September 2024

Wastewater Restores the Flow of the Santa Cruz River

The Santa Cruz River, which runs through Arizona and New Mexico, was a “dry wash” until University of Arizona scientists began introducing treated wastewater. With the increased water volume, over a two-year period, hundreds of invertebrate species as well as fish, frogs, and turtles have come back.

“I think the biggest surprise in our study was just how quickly species returned to the Santa Cruz River when flow was restored – it was astounding how fast biodiversity could recover when given a chance,” the study’s co-author Michael Bogan, a professor of aquatic ecology at the University of Arizona, told Salon. MSNBC — Full story.

Texas City Water Contaminated by Firefighting Agent

Residents of a large portion of Grand Prairie, TX were without water for a couple of days in early September when it was discovered that a foaming agent, which entered the water as a result of firefighting, had contaminated the water supply.  Although the chemical was classed as “environmentally friendly” and “non-PFAS,” residents were told not to use the water except for flushing until testing proved it safe. Around 60,000 North Texans were affected. City officials were praised for responding quickly, communicating effectively, and providing bottled water free of charge. Texas Commission for Environmental Quality (TCEQ) was faulted for having too few water testing facilities. (Samples had to be flown to test sites in distant parts of the state for testing.)

An underwater tunnel that passes beneath New York City’s East River sprang a leak on Sept. 4 after a city contractor mistakenly drilled a hole through it, sending streams of water into the heavily used tunnel. Officials were left scrambling to plug the opening and block off traffic after the accident.  Thousands of drivers who use the busy tunnel were upset.

EPA battles environmentalists in court over regulation of CAFOs and water pollution

A coalition of environmental organizations faced off against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in federal appellate court on September 12 in the latest skirmish in a long-running battle over the agency’s regulatory approach to water contamination connected to industrial agricultural operations.

The groups, led by the nonprofit Food & Water Watch, told a three-judge panel of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals that the EPA must strengthen its oversight of what are known as concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs).

The agency is unlawfully allowing roughly half of the nation’s more than 20,000 big livestock and poultry feeding facilities around the country to operate without permits required under the 1972 Clean Water Act, the groups argued to the court. And, they said, the agency is violating the law by authorizing CAFOs to store and spread manure so haphazardly that the drinking water for millions of people is at risk as thousands of streams, lakes and other waterways are polluted with harmful bacteria, nitrates, phosphorus and other contaminants.

The agency has “failed” for more than a decade to adequately regulate these operations, Food & Water Watch lawyer Emily Miller told the court. Read the rest of the story in New Lede.

Ingenious Plan to Solve California’s Water Shortage by Turning on a Very Large Faucet

Presidential candidate Donald Trump, speaking at a campaign rally in September, said:

“They have, essentially, a very large faucet. And you turn the faucet and it takes one day to turn it, it’s massive. It’s as big as that wall on that building right there behind you. And you turn that and all of that water goes aimlessly into the Pacific . And if you turned it back all of that water would come right down here and right into Los Angeles.” . No one is sure what he was talking about but it has been suggested that he is referring to a scheme he mentioned previously about solving California’s water shortage by diverting water from British Columbia.

Trump added that the water from the big faucet could also be “reverted” into the hills of California to prevent wildfires.

“You have all that water that could be used to … what they call water flow — where the land would be damp,” Trump said. “And you’d stop many of these horrible fires that are costing billions and billions of dollars.”  Full story.

Fluoride and Neurological Development of Children

Because of the government report acknowledging that high levels of fluoride exposure may harm neurological development and cognitive health in children, there is increased questioning of the wisdom of adding fluoride to public drinking water supplies. See “Is It Time to Rethink Fluoride in Drinking Water?”

Perhaps the most significant water news item of the month was the conclusion of a seven-year court case in which a federal court ruled that the fluoridation of water presents a significant risk to the neurological development of children.  See Pure Water Gazette article.

Water Speculators Represent a Major Threat to Sane Water Management

As the West suffers its worst megadrought in 1,200 years, investors have increasingly eyed water as a valuable asset and a resource to be exploited. For years, investment firms have bought up farmland throughout the Southwest, drilling to new depths for their water-hungry crops and causing nearby wells to run dry. Now, new players have entered the scene: “Water management companies” are purchasing up thousands of acres of farmland, with the intention of selling the water rights at a profit to cities and suburbs elsewhere in the state. Some argue that treating water as a commodity can efficiently get it where it is needed most. But others fear that water markets open the door to profiteering and hoarding, leaving poorer communities in the dust. Full article from Truthout.

When Water Turns to Sand: Demise of the Aral Sea.

In Central Asia, the world’s youngest desert occupies a basin that once held a vast saline lake. The Aral Sea.

Up until the 1960s, the sea spanned more than 26 thousand square miles across two countries. It supported thriving fishing communities along its shores. But then, in the name of progress and development, much of the river water that fed the sea was diverted for agriculture. Now the Aral Sea has all but disappeared, shrunk to about tenth of its original size. The UN Environment Programme has called the Aral Sea’s destruction  “one of the most staggering disasters of the 20th century.” NPR

In a stark visual reminder of the threat to public health from dangerous lead water pipes, NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council) today released a map based on U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) data revealing the specific communities and water systems most impacted by the estimated 9.2 million lead water pipes delivering drinking water to homes. There is no safe level of lead exposure.

The data confirm that lead pipes are found in all 50 states, with Illinois, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York and Florida having the most. Chicago and Cleveland are the cities with the most reported lead pipes, but the problem is also widespread across the nation with cities like Cocoa, Florida, and Atlanta, Georgia also having major problems. Millions more people are drinking water from pipes that could be lead because their local utilities have labeled their composition as “unknown.”

“Each lead pipe on this map connects an entire family to an urgent drinking water threat in their home,” said Valerie Baron, National Policy Director and Senior Attorney at NRDC’s Safe Water Initiative. “Children today are drinking water that traveled through the same dangerous pipe that was installed before their parents were even born. It is long past time for utilities and governments to take responsibilities for these hazards, and the first step is knowing where they are.”

This new data underscores the importance of EPA’s Lead and Copper Rule Improvements, which the agency promised will be finalized by October 16, one month from today. It is expected to represent the most significant step in a generation towards tackling the nationwide problem of lead in drinking water. For the first time, it will become federal policy to replace 100 percent of lead water pipes within 10 years, among other improvements.

“No one I’ve ever met wants to drink water from a lead straw, so the EPA’s final lead rule must finally fix the historic wrong of transporting drinking water through toxic lead pipes,” said Erik D. Olson, senior strategic director for health at NRDC. “Community leaders from Flint, Michigan to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Newark, New Jersey, and Chicago, Illinois have been fighting to clean up our tap water, and the government is right to recognize the urgent need to do more to protect the right to safe drinking water.”

$15B in federal funding is available to states but allocations are determined by a lead pipe inventory. Despite this financial incentive, EPA’s data exposes many water systems have failed to identify whether they have lead pipes, and some have characterized the material makeup of many or all of their water pipes as made of “unknown material.” But a comprehensive national requirement for water systems to complete an inventory identifying the location of their lead pipes becomes effective one month from today, October 16. The data from those inventories will not be immediately publicly available.

NRDC’s map is based upon EPA’s survey data recently publicly released after NRDC submitted a Freedom of Information Act request. Some highlights about the geographic location where pipes are located include:

• Lead pipes occur in all 50 states, but some states have a disproportionate problem. These include Illinois, Ohio, New York, New Jersey, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Florida, which are especially heavy hit. Other states, including North Carolina, Michigan, Georgia, Indiana, and Louisiana, also are among the states with the most reported lead pipes.
• A handful of cities report massive numbers of pipes known to have lead, including of course Chicago (387k), as well as Cleveland (235k), New York City (112k), Detroit MI (80k), Milwaukee WI (74k), Denver CO (64k), St. Louis, MO (63k). Indianapolis IN (55k), Minneapolis, MN (49k), Buffalo, NY (40k), Cocoa FL (37k), Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission in MD (36k), Pittsburgh PA (29k), Philadelphia PA (25k), and Atlanta (31k). Some of these cities (like NYC) have large numbers of service lines of unknown material (“unknowns”) that may be lead, and other cities (like Chicago) have found additional lead pipes since these data were reported to EPA, so these are likely underestimates for many cities. The number of unknowns is listed for each city, where reported.
• Some cities not previously widely recognized as having a lead problem have surprisingly high numbers of lead pipes. These include Cocoa, Florida (37k), Northern Kentucky Water District (28k), Conway, AR (27k), Pasco County Utilities – Pasco County Regional Water System FL (24k) (listed as “PCUD-Pasco County Regional PWS”). There are many other surprises including Fort Lauderdale, FL (23k), Memphis, TN (20k), and Winston-Salem, NC (13k).
• The top 30 cities with the most reported service lines containing lead are listed here. However, these numbers will change as more lead lines are discovered in these and many other cities.

Some highlights about water pipe inventories reported by Public Water Systems (water utilities) include:

• 20 percent of water utilities in the United States are thought to have some lead pipe in their service lines. These utilities serve more than 82 million people.
• Many water utilities have failed to identify their lead pipes—43 percent of water utilities serving 123 million people report that many or all their water lines are made from an “unknown” material.
• 23 percent of water utilities serving 30 million people in Texas, Louisiana, and California secured the ignominious distinction of having the highest percentages of non-reporting systems.

Additional Resources:

• Finding Lead Water Pipes: New NRDC Map Shows the Hot Spots in Every State
• Let’s Finish the Job and Get Lead Out of Our Drinking Water
• Report: Getting the Lead Out Costs Less Than You May Think
• Causes and Effects of Lead in Water
• How to Find Out if Your Home Has Lead Service Lines
• What’s Great and What Needs Fixing in the EPA’s Proposed Lead Rule

About NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council)
NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council) is an international nonprofit environmental organization with more than 3 million members and online activists. Established in 1970, NRDC uses science, policy, law and people power to confront the climate crisis, protect public health and safeguard nature. NRDC has offices in New York City, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, Beijing and Delhi (an office of NRDC India Pvt. Ltd).

Source: NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council)

Pure Water Gazette Fair Use Statement

Federal Court Rules That Fluoridation Chemicals Pose An “Unreasonable Risk” To Health

Introductory Note: Fluoride Action Network, a group that has for many years opposed the fluoridation of drinking water, recently won a case in a US district court which found that fluoridation presents an “unreasonable risk” to the health of children. The case has been in court for seven years.  As a result, the US EPA will now be required to regulate fluoridation as a health risk to children.  The paragraph below is an excerpt from the introduction to the ruling.

“The issue before this Court is whether the Plaintiffs have established by a preponderance of the evidence that the fluoridation of drinking water at levels typical in the United States poses an unreasonable risk of injury to health of the public within the meaning of Amended TSCA. For the reasons set forth below, the Court so finds. Specifically, the Court finds that fluoridation of water at 0.7 milligrams per liter (“mg/L”) – the level presently considered “optimal” in the United States – poses an unreasonable risk of reduced IQ in children… The Court finds there is an unreasonable risk of such injury, a risk sufficient to require the EPA to engage with a regulatory response…One thing the EPA cannot do, however, in the face of this Court’s finding, is to ignore that risk.”

It’s the first time a federal judge has made a determination about the neurodevelopmental risks to children of the recommended U.S. water fluoride level, said Ashley Malin, a University of Florida researcher who has studied the effect of higher fluoride levels in pregnant women.

She called it “the most historic ruling in the U.S. fluoridation debate that we’ve ever seen.”  (Associated Press)

Don’t expect anything to happen quickly on this issue. Fluoride in water has been a controversial issue for decades, and the knowledge that children’s IQ can be lowered by ingestion of fluoride by mothers and babies alike is not new.  (See “Fluoride and IQ in Children” in the Pure Water Gazette.) The wheels of change turn slowly. Expect legal appeals and more legal appeals and probably studies and more studies. This court ruling, however, represents a significant victory in the fight to outlaw the fluoridation of public drinking water.

Source:  National Public Radio. Kera.

Pure Water Gazette Fair Use Statement

Water News for August 2024

The Largest Dam Removal Project in U.S. History Is Almost Finished

The dismantling of four hydroelectric dams on the Klamath River, which began in June 2023 and has involved hundreds of workers, is the largest dam removal effort in U.S. history. Full story. LA Times.

PFAS in River Fish

Scientists tested nine fish species from four northern Illinois rivers for contamination with per- or polyfluoroalkyl substances, synthetic chemicals found in numerous industrial and commercial products and known to be harmful to human health. They found fish contaminated with PFAS in every one of their 15 test sites. Elevated levels of PFOS, one type of PFAS compound, were found in nearly all fish tested. Technology Networks.

Climate Change and Wastewater Systems

The Pacific Institute, Livelihoods Knowledge Exchange Network (LiKEN), and Rural Community Assistance Partnership Incorporated (RCAP) released new research outlining how climate change impacts are leading to devastating consequences for water and wastewater systems in rural communities across the United States. Water Online. 

Record Number of Heat Records Broken

A record 15 national heat records have been broken in 2024, as weather extremes grow more frequent and climate breakdown intensifies. The geographic range of all-time national records is staggering. Mexico tied its peak of 52C (125.6F) at Tepache on 20 June. On the other side of the world, the Australian territory of Cocos Islands tied its all-time high with 32.8C (91F) on 7 April for the third time this year. The Guardian.

Violence over Water On the Rise

Violence over water resources increased dramatically in 2023, continuing a steep growth trend of such incidents over the past decade. These events include attacks on water systems, unrest and disputes over the control of and access to water, and the use of water as a weapon of war. The number of events has risen rapidly in recent years, with 150% as many incidents in 2023 as those recorded in 2022 (347 events versus 231). In the year 2000, there were only 22 such incidents recorded.

“The significant upswing in violence over water resources reflects continuing disputes over control and access to scarce water resources, the importance of water for modern society, growing pressures on water due to population growth and extreme climate change, and ongoing attacks on water systems where war and violence are widespread, especially in the Middle East and Ukraine,” said Dr. Peter Gleick, Senior Fellow and co-founder of the Pacific Institute. Wateronline.

Amistad Struggling

Amistad reservoir in Texas reached record-low levels this summer, with images from space capturing the staggering scale of its decline. The Amistad reservoir, straddling the Texas-Mexico border on the Rio Grande, dropped to less than a quarter full in July this year, hitting a record low of 1,047.15 feet above sea level on July 17. The previous record low was seen in August 2022, when the reservoir hit 1,052.48 feet. This year, the reservoir has been below 1,052 feet since February. The Amistad was created with the construction of the Amistad Dam in 1969 and is a joint venture between the U.S. and Mexico to provide water and hydroelectric power to both countries. MSN.com.

AI and Water Consumption

AI is thirsty for water. ChatGPT gulps roughly a 16-ounce bottle in as few as 10 queries, according to calculations by Shaolei Ren, associate professor of electrical and computer engineering at UC Riverside, and his colleagues.

AI Doesn’t Just Consume Tons of Energy. It’s a Water Hog as Well

“The growing carbon footprint of artificial intelligence (AI) models, especially large ones such as GPT-3, has been undergoing public scrutiny. Unfortunately, however, the equally important and enormous water (withdrawal and consumption) footprint of AI models has remained under the radar. For example, training GPT-3 in Microsoft’s state-of-the-art U.S. data centers can directly evaporate 700,000 liters of clean freshwater, but such information has been kept a secret. More critically, the global AI demand may be accountable for 4.2 — 6.6 billion cubic meters of water withdrawal in 2027, which is more than the total annual water withdrawal of 4 to 6 Denmark-sized countries or half of the United Kingdom. This is very concerning, as freshwater scarcity has become one of the most pressing challenges shared by all of us in the wake of the rapidly growing population, depleting water resources, and aging water infrastructures. To respond to the global water challenges, AI models can, and also must, take social responsibility and lead by example by addressing their own water footprint.”    LA TIMES. 

Microplastics in Human Organs

Microplastics are infiltrating brain tissue, studies show. Twenty-four brain samples collected in early 2024 measured on average about 0.5% plastic by weight. A growing body of scientific evidence shows that microplastics are accumulating in critical human organs, including the brain. Studies have detected tiny shards and specks of plastics in human lungs, placentas, reproductive organs, livers, kidneys, knee and elbow joints, blood vessels and bone marrow.Given the research findings, “It is now imperative to declare a global emergency” to deal with plastic pollution, said Sedat Gündoğdu, who studies microplastics at Cukurova University in Turkey. Humans are exposed to microplastics – defined as fragments smaller than 5mm in diameter – and the chemicals used to make plastics from widespread plastic pollution in air, water and even food. Full article from The Guardian.

Dead Chickens in South Carolina River

A South Carolina riverkeeper reported finding hundreds of dead chickens floating in the water of Edisto River. Throwing animal bodies into a river is a crime and a threat to public health.

Federal Funds for Lead Removal in Schools

The schools and daycare centers in Georgia were awarded $1.5 million in additional federal funds to get lead out of water. This is one of several federal grants for water protection for schools announced this month.

A federal judge has slapped the son of Republican West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice with a contempt of court citation for repeatedly failing to respond to a Clean Water Act lawsuit against a family-owned coal products firm.

Chinese scientists claim to have invented a way to extract water from the moon’s soil – a potentially vital step towards building a lunar research base.

A recent study from Utrecht University in the Netherlands warns that climate change and socio-economic transformations will exacerbate water scarcity, disproportionately affecting populations in South Asian countries. Countercurrents.org.

Startup Instructions for your Pure Water Products SXT Water Softener

How Coal Mining Degrades Water Quality

Excerpted from an article by Ellen Montgomery of Environment America

Beyond headwater stream loss, mountaintop removal has severe impacts on water quality that can persist for decades post-mining. According to a report by the EPA, water quality degradation from mountaintop mines and valley fills can reach levels fatally toxic to wildlife. Valley fills drastically increase salinity and metal concentrations downstream, endangering sensitive organisms such as salamanders and certain fish species.

Of all the watershed degradation issues in coal mining areas, acid mine drainage is one of the most serious. Acid mine drainage (AMD) occurs when water reacts with sulfur-bearing minerals in rocks, resulting in highly acidic water that contains toxic heavy metals. It poses a severe threat to wildlife and renders affected waterways unusable for drinking and recreation. In some areas, the water flowing from coal mines can burn your skin because it is so acidic.

AMD can also turn the water an alarming orange or red color — a widespread problem in central Appalachia, where many streams are tainted with orange, acidic water. Acid mine drainage is a significant water quality issue in the US, where it degrades approximately 12,400 miles of rivers and streams, posing health risks to ecosystems and nearby communities.

Environment America

Pure Water Gazette Fair Use Statement