Water for Coffee

by Hardly Waite

The Pure Water Gazette has already devoted more than a sensible number of words to the subject of the nature of perfect water for making coffee.  See, for example, What kind of water makes the best tasting coffee?  and What is the ideal water for brewing coffee?   But since there is always room for another opinion, here is more advice on coffee brewing, this from Axeon Water’s website.  Axeon is a major supplier of water treatment equipment, especially known for its large reverse osmosis units.  The article is called Getting more out of your coffee.

Americans’ love of coffee dates back to the Boston Tea Party in 1773 when the colonists boycotted tea. The colonists united and vowed to only serve coffee in their homes. Ever since, the American taste for coffee has continued to grow.

Most attention of course is given to the type of coffee bean and where it is grown. After all it is the coffee bean that provides the caffeine. Yet the coffee bean alone does not constitute the flavor of coffee. Remember better than 98% of coffee is water. Water is the solvent responsible for leaching all those flavors and oils out of the coffee bean and into the coffee drink.

Drinking water from the tap contains varying amounts of total dissolved solids (TDS). TDS is composed of a variety of salts and minerals such as sodium chloride (table salt) and hardness (calcium and magnesium). Without controlling the consistency of the TDS, the coffee can swing from very bitter to weak. Too low TDS will result in a very bitter taste while high of TDS will result in a weak taste due to less than sufficient extraction of the coffee bean organics. Generally speaking, 150 ppm is often considered the target TDS level.

The individual salts and minerals of the TDS can affect the flavor of coffee. Chlorides will impart a sweet taste; however, at higher levels the taste turns sour. Sulfates on the other hand accentuate the bitterness. Softening the water by removing the hardness is not necessarily the ideal. Hardness (such as calcium and magnesium) is actually preferable for extracting the organic flavor from the coffee bean. Without the proper amount of mineral hardness, the coffee will be very bitter.

Municipal tap water also contains either chlorine or chloramines as a method of disinfecting the water supply. Chlorine and chloramine alters the taste by imparting medicinal odors.

To perfect the taste of coffee, coffee shops often turn to reverse osmosis filtration to design a water profile that best suits the extraction of flavor from the coffee bean. Brewers opt to blend the permeate water from the reverse osmosis with pretreated water that is bypassed around the reverse osmosis unit. Changing the ratio of this blend allows the coffee brewer the flexibility to modify the total dissolved minerals in the water as needed.


To clarify, what they are suggesting as the way to manufacture perfect water for coffee is to treat the water by reverse osmosis.  This will normally produce water that is way below the ideal 150 ppm Total Dissolved Solids.  To bump the TDS to 150, the product water from the RO unit (permeate) is blended with filtered tap water to arrive at water with the correct dissolved solids level but with chlorine or chloramines removed. This may prove to be way too much trouble for home coffee brewers, but restaurants might go to the trouble to assure a perfect product.  In practical terms, if your local tap water is naturally in the 150 range, you would want to filter it with a good carbon filter (but not reverse osmosis) to remove the disinfectants and other taste/odor issues and use it as it is.  For example, our local tap water comes from a lake and is usually around 180 ppm dissolved solids.  That’s close enough.

 

 

 

 

 A Bridge Too Far

by Janice Karpersen

Several environmental groups have filed a lawsuit in New York to prevent state officials from using money from the Clean Water State Revolving Fund to build a bridge—something they contend has nothing to do with clean water.

The purpose of the CWSRF is to provide low-interest loans for communities to meet Clean Water Act goals. Since it began 25 years ago, the CWSRF has provided more than $100 billion in funding, currently averaging about $5 billion a year for controlling nonpoint-source pollution, protecting drinking water sources, treating wastewater, and other water-related projects. In all it has funded more than 33,000 loans.

Construction work for the Tappan Zee Bridge, the lawsuit says, is not one of those projects. New York State is trying to pay for $511 million in bridge-related work—including dredging, pile driving, and demolition—with CWSRF funds. In September EPA stated that the work to be done with $482 million of the proposed loan, or about 95%, was not an appropriate use of CWSRF money, but the state says EPA’s approval is not needed, according to the suit.

Marc Yaggi, executive director of Waterkeeper Alliance, one of the groups filing the lawsuit, said that allowing the state to use clean water funds for other purposes would set a bad precedent for other states to do the same. The other groups filing the suit are Riverkeeper and Environmental Advocates of New York.

You can read the complete lawsuit here.

Source: Stormwater.

Pure Water Gazette Fair Use Statement

First Sex Occurred in Water: Now We Know

by Gene Franks

Copulation in progress.  If you’re 18 or older, you can see an animated version of the primitive sex act here.

On October 19, 2014, the prestigious British science journal Nature reported findings by Professor John Long et al of Flinders University which it hailed as “one of the biggest discoveries in the evolutionary history of sexual reproduction.”

Nature  a couple of weeks ago rejected as “too controversial” a paid advertisement from the Dr. Bronner soap company  which presented solid research linking GMO agriculture to excessive use of pesticides, but the  journal did not hesitate to give its hearty endorsement  to conclusions about events that took place 385 million years ago and that might not be completely convincing to everyone.

Professor Long et al. “found that internal fertilisation and copulation appeared in ancient armoured fishes, called placoderms, about 385 million years ago in what is now Scotland.” Long reached this conclusion after stumbling across a single fossil bone in the collections of the University of Technology in Tallinn, Estonia last year.  Long concluded that the bone is a “clasper” or primitive penis as it were.  The discovery, Long says, ” now pushes the origin of copulation back even further down the evolutionary ladder, to the most basal of all jawed animals. Basically it’s the first branch off the evolutionary tree where these reproductive strategies started.”

You can read the full account of Dr. Long’s discovery and see a computer simulation of a 385 million year old placoderm tryst on the Archaeology News Network.